The Future of Meat is Meatless; Is It Also Greener and Healthier?
Sales for plant-based meat continue to skyrocket as consumers look for better alternatives. But is meatless meat a healthier option?
Stay up-to-date on the latest from the Center for Nutrition Studies!
Thank you, your sign-up request was successful!
Oops! Something went wrong, please contact newsletter@nutritionstudies.org
Nelson Huber-Disla is the managing editor for the T. Colin Campbell Center for Nutrition Studies. He is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where he studied English. He lives in Durham, North Carolina, and he is the contributing author of The Future of Nutrition: An Insider’s Look at the Science, Why We Keep Getting it Wrong, and How to Start Getting it Right.
Sales for plant-based meat continue to skyrocket as consumers look for better alternatives. But is meatless meat a healthier option?
Grass-fed bed is more popular than ever before as consumers look for “healthier” and “cleaner” meat options. But is organic meat really a “cleaner” option?
We are a people preoccupied with protein. We have been ever since we discovered the nutrient in the mid-19th century. You might have heard that protein comes from the Greek proteios, meaning “of prime importance.”[1] And it is important—we cannot live without it. But judging by the level of attention granted to protein—in the mind … Continued
Changes in life expectancy can help us assess our collective health history. And there are a few lessons we can glean from the long-term trends.
Poor sleep (either insufficient duration of sleep or low-quality sleep) is associated with a weakened immune system, Alzheimer’s, disrupted blood sugar levels, cardiovascular disease, psychiatric conditions, and more.
What’s the truth about fruit? How does it affect our health, and what about more specific cases, like if we’re diabetic or trying to lose weight?
In the greater context of the “war on cancer,” colorectal cancer seems a clear success. Compared to other cancer sites, incidence and mortality rates for colorectal cancer have improved tremendously. And there’s a chance that we would know much less about this disease, including how to prevent and treat it, if not for the concerted efforts of recent decades.
We have certainly learned a lot about the nutrition-cancer connection in the last century – or have we? What can we learn by taking a look at a 100-year-old study?
In a previous article, “Is it Time to Quit the ‘War on Cancer’?” we introduced the background for that so-called war, reviewed the policy changes that resulted from the 1971 legislation,[1] and analyzed why it may be time to put the war metaphor aside. We also saw that the fundamental question—are we winning the war?—is … Continued